JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 24, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Angelmiro Crofort Hernandez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto de competencia planteado, toda vez que la Corte explicó que en el presente caso se trata de un conflicto suscitado entre dos juzgados civiles de circuito de diferentes distritos judiciales, pero de la misma jurisdicción, es claro que le corresponde a la Sala Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, resolver el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial, suscitado entre los aludidos despachos judiciales, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Art. 28 del Código de Procedimiento Civil.

En consecuencia, ordenó remitir el expediente a la mencionada Sala para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Abstenerse de resolver el conflicto de competencia planteado.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente a la Sala Civil y Agraria de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que ella resuelva el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado
  3. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga (Santander.) y el Juzgado Veintitres Civil del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota D.C., en la accion de tutela incoada por Angelmiro Crofort Hernandez contra Ahorramas, Banco de la Republica y Superintendencia Bancaria.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.